View from the Bridge

Innovation in Healthcare: A Pragmatist’s Perspective

Innovation in Healthcare IT: From Ideas to Impact

Innovation has become one of the most overused and misunderstood words in healthcare.  We talk about it constantly.  We celebrate it publicly.  We fund it enthusiastically.  Yet too often, innovation in healthcare information technology (HIT) produces pilots that never scale, tools that never integrate, and enthusiasm that fades long before measurable value appears.  That is not a failure of creativity.  It is a failure of discipline.

Healthcare does not suffer from a lack of ideas.  It suffers from a lack of governed innovation and executive alignment around what innovation is meant to achieve.  Successful innovation must be valued, i.e., explicitly recognized, measured, prioritized, and defended because its value is understood by the organization’s decision-makers, not just admired by its creators.

Innovation Is Not Technology

Innovation is not the adoption of new technology.  Innovation is the measurable improvement of outcomes whether they be clinical, operational, financial, or workforce, all of which can be enabled by technology.

In healthcare, innovation operates within an environment of regulatory scrutiny, patient safety imperatives, workforce shortages, legacy systems, and financial pressures.  That reality does not excuse slow progress, but it does demand intentionality.  Novelty alone is not innovation.  Impact is.

True innovation improves care quality and safety, expands access, reduces friction for clinicians, strengthens financial sustainability, or meaningfully improves the experience of patients and families.  If it does not do at least one of those things, it is experimentation, not innovation.

The least expensive and most readily available innovation can be accomplished by leveraging existing investments.  Inventory what’s working and what’s not.  Ask your users how their environment and outcomes can be improved.  Before you start to redesign workflows and promise a better future, make sure you check with those users to validate your understanding of their expectations during the design or redesign process.  Visit with them often during the build phase.  After doing internal testing, get them engaged in validation.  Invite candid feedback and adjust as necessary.  Be present during implementation and ask the users as well as the patients and families to evaluate both the innovations and outcomes without being defensive.  In summary, follow the favorite advice shared from a former boss, “Lead with your ears.”

Why Innovation Often Stalls

Demand for IT resources far exceeds capacity, and without discipline, innovation competes poorly against the “tyranny of the urgent.”

When innovation stalls, the root causes are rarely technical.  They are usually organizational:

  • Too many initiatives and not enough prioritization or too many high priorities
  • Unclear decision rights
  • Insufficient executive sponsorship
  • Weak alignment to enterprise strategy
  • Inadequate funding models
  • Poor measurement of value

In other words, innovation fails when governance fails.

Governance Is Not the Enemy of Innovation

Governance has an image problem, often viewed as bureaucratic, slow, or risk averse.  Good governance is what allows innovation to survive.  There’s an applicable carpenter’s lesson, “Measure twice.  Cut once.”  Instead of “fail fast”, choose “succeed fast”.

Governance clarifies who decides, how decisions are made, what gets funded, and what success looks like.  It ensures that innovation aligns with enterprise strategy rather than operating as a collection of disconnected experiments.  Most importantly, governance protects trust between clinicians, IT, executives, and boards.

Innovation without governance leads to chaos.  Governance without innovation leads to stagnation.  Sustainable progress requires both.

Moving Beyond ROI: The Value of Investment (VOI)

One of the most common mistakes organizations make is evaluating innovation using traditional ROI alone.  While ROI is necessary, it is not sufficient, especially in healthcare.

Many of the most important benefits of HIT innovation do not show up neatly in a financial ledger.  You can and should quantify and measure the impact of:

  • Improved patient safety,
  • Reduced clinician burnout,
  • Greater operational flexibility,
  • Faster response to emerging risks, and
  • Strategic positioning for future care models

This is why I advocate for a Value of Investment (VOI) approach.  VOI expands the conversation beyond simple financial return to include:

  • Financial performance (ROI, IRR, NPV),
  • Clinical quality and safety,
  • Operational efficiency,
  • Workforce well-being,
  • Risk mitigation (technical, operational, cybersecurity, regulatory), and
  • Strategic and social value.

VOI does not weaken financial discipline.  It strengthens it by forcing leaders to be explicit about why an investment matters and how success will be measured.

If you cannot explain the value of an innovation in language that resonates with executives, you should not be surprised when it fails to gain traction.

Innovation Lives or Dies in the C-Suite

Great ideas do not sell themselves. Executives do not buy technology; they buy outcomes, risk reduction, and strategic advantage.

One of the most important skills for HIT leaders and innovators is learning how to engage the C-suite effectively.  That means understanding what matters to different executives. Generally,

  • CEOs focus on mission, reputation, resilience, and long-term positioning,
  • CFOs focus on capital efficiency, predictability, and risk,
  • CMOs and CNOs focus on safety, quality, and workforce sustainability, and
  • CIOs and digital leaders focus on scalability, integration, and security.

Access to the C-suite is not about hierarchy or persistence.  It is about relevance.  Leaders earn time with executives by framing problems clearly, proposing solutions responsibly, and demonstrating how innovation complements, not competes, with existing priorities.

A Simple Operating Model for Sustainable Innovation

Successful healthcare organizations treat innovation as a repeatable capability, not an ad-hoc activity.  A practical operating model looks like this:

  1. Start with clear strategic intent.
  2. Use governed intake for innovation demand.
  3. Prioritize using a VOI-based framework.
  4. Execute with discipline and accountability.
  5. Measure outcomes, not activity.
  6. Learn, refine, and scale what works.

This approach does not slow innovation.  It increases the odds that innovation matters.

Innovation as Stewardship

At its core, innovation in healthcare IT is not about being first or flashy.  It is about stewardship and impact.  Every dollar invested, every workflow changed, every system deployed affects patients, families, clinicians, and communities.  We must move from experimentation to transformation.

The most important question leaders should ask is not “What can we build?” but “What problem are we responsibly solving, and for whom?”  Success depends upon how wisely we choose, how well we govern, and how consistently we deliver outcomes that truly matter.

In healthcare, innovation is not a privilege.  It is a responsibility.

Leave a Reply

Top